6.5 C
Berlin
Saturday, April 26, 2025
spot_img
Home Blog Page 5

Former Google China President Kai-Fu Lee: Chinese AI Companies Must Forge Their Own Path

Tendenzblick
-
0
Former Google China President Kai-Fu Lee: Chinese AI Companies Must Forge Their Own Path

In May 2024, Lingyiwanwu launched Yi-Large, a model that quickly surpassed GPT-4 across various authoritative evaluation sets. By October, Yi-Lightning was introduced, exceeding the performance of GPT-4o, released by OpenAI in May, in the LMSYS Chatbot Arena, a well-known international blind test platform. 

This remarkable progress indicates that Yi-Lightning managed to close the gap with the world’s leading model in a mere five to six months. However, accelerating this timeline further poses significant challenges for any Chinese AI company, particularly given the vast resources of global leaders like Google, Meta, OpenAI, and xAI, which have substantial advantages in terms of funding, computational power, and talent. At least for now, the resource-heavy approach employed by these companies is not easily replicable in China.

This raises an important question that the public have asked recently: should Chinese AI companies abandon pre-training models? This question reflects the growing anxiety within the industry, as some believe that the gap between Chinese models and global leaders is difficult to bridge. 

Lee’s view is that the decision to abandon pre-training needs to consider three critical factors. First, whether the company has the financial resources to support pre-training. Many leading Chinese companies have raised enough funding to back such efforts, so this is not necessarily a prohibitive barrier. Second, whether the team is capable of executing pre-training effectively and achieving results that outperform existing open-source models. Chinese teams need to ensure that their models deliver significant advancements over current alternatives to justify the expense and effort. Finally, Chinese AI companies need to assess whether the return on investment for pre-training is worthwhile. This involves considering whether the trained model will have a long lifecycle and generate substantial commercial value. 

While pre-training remains a valid approach for some companies, others may need to seek more pragmatic paths. Rather than attempting to replicate the resource-intensive model-building approaches of giants like OpenAI, Chinese companies should focus on areas where they can leverage their strengths—particularly in engineering and application implementation, where they excel globally.

Chinese AI teams are renowned for their ability to deliver exceptional engineering solutions, and they have proven themselves at the forefront of applied AI technology. Companies such as Lingyiwanwu have demonstrated how focusing on specialized areas can yield competitive advantages. Lingyiwanwu has built a world-class AI infrastructure team composed of top-tier international talent, enabling them to optimize their model training processes. By focusing on training efficiency, Lingyiwanwu has achieved a 99% effective training ratio, allowing them to build highly competitive models with fewer resources. This approach has allowed Yi-Lightning to be trained at a fraction of the cost of other leading models like Grok-2, yet it ranks alongside them on LMSYS. 

While the ranking is impressive, Yi-Lightning’s true technological value is confirmed through authoritative reviews, showing that the model is not just competitive in terms of performance but also cost-effective. This strategy has led to Yi-Lightning being priced at just 0.99 RMB per million tokens, making it an attractive option for AI-native entrepreneurs looking for both high performance and low-cost solutions.

Yi-Lightning’s pre-training process cost approximately $3 million and involved 2000 graphics cards, but the model’s life cycle can be extended through post-training techniques. These include Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), Online DPO, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), and inference, which together help extend the model’s usability for up to a year. 

Extending the life cycle of models is critical for maximizing commercial returns and laying the groundwork for future model iterations. As the AI landscape evolves, focusing on these extensions of model utility will provide an ongoing advantage, allowing Chinese companies to refine and iterate upon their models with greater efficiency. Lingyiwanwu continues to explore further internal optimizations and will update its progress accordingly.

Beyond the technical aspects of model development, successful deployment is key to creating long-term value. Yi-Lightning, for example, is not just a high-performing model; it also has a highly competitive price point that makes it accessible to a wide range of users. This price-to-performance ratio ensures that it can drive commercial value by enabling businesses, particularly AI-native startups, to leverage the power of large models without incurring prohibitive costs. 

Additionally, Lingyiwanwu is focusing on specific industry applications, such as retail solutions and smart computing centers, which have already garnered interest from major clients like Yum China. By focusing on specific application scenarios, Lingyiwanwu is positioning itself as a key player in the Chinese market, where the demand for AI solutions is growing rapidly.

Despite the clear resource disparity between Chinese companies and their Silicon Valley counterparts, there are areas where Chinese teams can still gain an edge. China boasts a large pool of skilled and diligent engineers who can drive more efficient model training processes, while its massive market and diverse application scenarios provide opportunities to deploy AI solutions at scale. By leveraging these strengths, Chinese companies can position themselves to lead the AI 2.0 era. 

This era is defined not only by model development but by the ability to deploy and scale AI solutions quickly and cost-effectively. By focusing on building models that offer both performance and cost-efficiency, Chinese companies can promote the widespread adoption of large models, ultimately creating a self-reinforcing ecosystem that will fuel future innovation.

This strategy will allow Chinese AI companies to build a competitive advantage, overcoming resource limitations through smarter, more efficient development and deployment methods. It will also provide a solid foundation for the ongoing evolution of the AI industry in China, helping local companies eventually reach parity with, and potentially surpass, the current global leaders in the field. The combination of resource optimization, industry-specific solutions, and cost-effective model deployment offers a promising path for Chinese AI companies to lead the next wave of technological innovation.

Source: daxue consulting, zhihu, cnbc

America, It’s Time to Shatter the Stability of Public Sector Positions

Tendenzblick
-
0
America, It’s Time to Shatter the Stability of Public Sector Positions

On November 12, 2024, President-elect Donald Trump announced the appointment of Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency. Their mandate is to eliminate bureaucratic inefficiencies, cut wasteful spending, reduce redundant regulations, and reorganize federal agencies. 

Musk took to social media to announce that the department would recruit reformers with exceptionally high IQs, who are willing to work over 80 hours a week without pay.

This initiative marks the beginning of a government reform effort in the U.S., with Trump focusing on shrinking the federal government. Trump has long advocated for small government, emphasizing the need for limited government interference in society and promoting the importance of private enterprise and individual decision-making. 

With a 2023 federal budget of $6.2 trillion, U.S. government costs are high, and Trump has criticized what he sees as wasteful spending. He has set an ambitious goal to reduce government size and inefficiency by July 4, 2026, the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

Elon Musk is well-suited to lead this effort, given his reputation for bold, unconventional, and high-risk ventures. Known for his ability to drive efficiency, Musk has a track record of cutting costs and accelerating innovation, as seen with Tesla, SpaceX, and his recent acquisition of Twitter. Musk’s approach includes reducing government spending by 30%, which could amount to a $2 trillion saving. This reform effort goes beyond the budget cuts of previous administrations, such as Reagan’s and Clinton’s, which focused on reducing the growth of government. Trump and Musk aim for nothing less than a revolutionary overhaul.

The initiative reflects Trump’s distrust of the federal bureaucracy, which he has often criticized during his previous presidency, including targeting agencies like the Department of Justice and the FBI. This time, Trump, with the backing of Musk, is taking a direct aim at the very structure of the U.S. government. While Trump’s previous criticisms of the government were met with resistance, his 2024 victory—having won both the Electoral College and the popular vote—provides him with more legitimacy to pursue such a sweeping agenda.

The creation of the Department of Government Efficiency is a bold move. Despite being only a consulting body and not an official government agency, it is expected to influence substantial reforms across the federal government. Musk’s vision includes creating a list of the dumbest tax expenditures to allow taxpayers to identify wasteful spending. The department’s work will be publicly tracked, with Musk promising to provide regular updates. 

However, the size and complexity of the U.S. federal government mean that this reform faces enormous challenges. Trump and Musk are not just targeting inefficiency but also the entrenched interests and political power within government. Their plan involves cutting trillions of dollars in spending, a task far more ambitious than the incremental reforms of past administrations. The goal of cutting government spending by $2 trillion would represent an unprecedented scale of change.

While similar efforts have been attempted in the past, such as Reagan’s 1980s budget cuts and Clinton’s 1990s government downsizing, the current push under Trump and Musk aims to go much further. The reform is not just about reducing the growth of government but about fundamentally reshaping it. Musk’s comments suggest that this effort will have a knock-on effect across the entire system, potentially affecting many people involved in government spending.

Despite their bold plans, Trump and Musk’s efforts face substantial hurdles. The political polarization in the U.S. is intense, and such large-scale reforms could provoke significant opposition. As a democratically elected president, Trump has promised to unite the country, but implementing these reforms in a politically divided environment will be challenging. Furthermore, the details of how the reforms will be implemented remain unclear. Trump has said the department will provide guidance on large-scale structural reforms and introduce entrepreneurial methods to the government. However, no specifics have been offered on how efficiency will be achieved or what metrics will be used to measure success.

One of the major challenges is that the Department of Government Efficiency is not an official government agency but rather a consulting organization. It remains unclear who will execute the reforms or how they will be implemented across existing government structures. Will a new organization be set up? Or will civil servants be expected to carry out the changes themselves? These unanswered questions suggest that the practicalities of the reform may not be revealed until after Trump is inaugurated.

Reform is never easy, especially when it involves the size and complexity of the U.S. government. While Trump and Musk’s plan is ambitious, it’s important to remember that running a government and managing a business are fundamentally different tasks. A business can focus on financial outcomes, but the government impacts the lives of millions of people. This difference means that the proposed reforms must be carefully balanced, ensuring that they are both effective and mindful of their social consequences.

The political implications of these reforms are also significant. The reforms will likely face resistance from various factions within the government, and the social consequences of such large-scale changes are unpredictable. Political polarization in the U.S. is deep, and such a major restructuring could exacerbate tensions.

While Trump’s focus on reducing government size is not new, the scale and ambition of this reform make it a defining moment in his presidency. The challenges are immense, but the potential for change is equally significant. The success or failure of this reform will depend not only on Trump and Musk’s ability to overcome bureaucratic resistance but also on their ability to navigate the political and social complexities of modern America.

Source: fox

Yiwu’s Story: Why the World’s Supermarket Predicts U.S. Election Outcomes

Tendenzblick
-
0
Yiwu’s Story: Why the World’s Supermarket Predicts U.S. Election Outcomes

The recent U.S. elections sparked a humorous theory: Yiwu’s sales of candidate support materials could predict the presidency. While unscientific, this notion underscores Yiwu’s global reputation as a hub for small commodities. 

Yiwu’s evolution from a resource-poor county to an international trade powerhouse rests on two key factors. First, the entrepreneurial spirit and trade acumen of its people aligned naturally with modernization and economic globalization. Second, the proactive governance of a competent government provided the foundation for sustained growth. 

The Spirit Behind Chicken Feathers for Sugar

Yiwu, a city in Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, is surrounded by mountains and lacks access to the sea. Its small, acidic, and infertile arable land historically created significant challenges. To enhance soil fertility, Yiwu residents developed a chicken feather fertilizer technique, using chicken feathers mixed with ash to nourish crops. As chicken feathers became scarce, locals began trading sugarcane—well-suited to the acidic soil—for feathers, initiating the practice known as “Chicken Feathers for Sugar.”

Over time, this bartering expanded beyond sugar and feathers to include goods like handicrafts, tools, and scrap materials. Yiwu traders would travel extensively, selling and exchanging products while maintaining ties to their hometown. This trade fostered a specialized division of labor, with roles such as sugar producers, traders, and logistics providers. For example, sugar factories manufactured and lent goods, while others managed purchasing, logistics, or consignment services. On the road, traders were organized into hierarchical roles based on experience and responsibilities.

This structured system turned a simple barter practice into a sustainable, professional, and highly organized trade network. The activity became deeply embedded in Yiwu’s culture, fostering resilience, adaptability, and entrepreneurship among its people. Even under socialist reforms post-1949, which curtailed private trade, the Chicken Feathers for Sugar ethos endured as a defining trait of Yiwu’s commercial spirit.

Government Action and the Revival of Commerce

Yiwu’s economic transformation reflects the interplay between entrepreneurial traditions and government support. Before the reforms of the late 20th century, informal trade practices such as chicken feathers for sugar symbolized the survival instincts of Yiwu’s residents in an environment marked by infertile soil and limited arable land. These marginal economic activities laid the groundwork for what would later become a thriving trade hub. The local trade ethos persisted despite suppression during China’s socialist reforms, with informal bazaars demonstrating resilience and adaptability.

The turning point came with the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee in 1978, which legitimized small-scale commerce. Yiwu’s first regulated small commodity market emerged in 1982, and subsequent expansions culminated in the establishment of the Yiwu International Trade City, the world’s largest wholesale market. This marked a shift from local barter systems to global trade networks, underpinned by standardization and a focus on higher-quality goods. The transformation from informal roadside markets to a world supermarket was driven by strategic government interventions and the entrepreneurial spirit of Yiwu’s people.

The Yiwu government played a pivotal role in this development by balancing market spontaneity with regulation. Its support extended to creating enterprise service stations and assisting businesses in logistical and regulatory matters, ensuring a business-friendly environment. Strategic initiatives like the Yiwu Fair, designed to complement the Canton Fair, boosted market visibility and international engagement. Efforts such as launching the Chinagoods app and establishing the China-Europe liner further integrated Yiwu into global trade networks, reducing barriers for businesses and expanding markets. By prioritizing the interests of non-local traders, including foreign nationals, the government cultivated a sense of belonging among the diverse business community, attracting over 15,000 foreign merchants and numerous foreign enterprises.

Yiwu’s evolution from a small trading hub to an international trade powerhouse exemplifies the fusion of grassroots innovation and strategic governance. The city’s pragmatic approach to addressing market needs, fostering inclusivity, and supporting enterprises has created an environment where traders can focus exclusively on business without being burdened by external concerns. This dynamic has sustained Yiwu’s growth for over four decades, making it a model for integrating local initiatives with global ambitions.

Yiwu’s Evolution Through Its Social Heritage

Yiwu’s transformation from a struggling rural county to the world capital of small commodities reflects the interplay of cultural heritage, entrepreneurial spirit, and strategic governance. Rooted in its challenging geography and limited resources. This spirit of ingenuity evolved into a collective social characteristic, embedding trade and entrepreneurship into the local identity. The Yiwu Spirit, characterized by hard work, integrity, and tolerance—became a cultural cornerstone that supported the city’s rapid economic ascent.

The local government played an essential role in fostering this development. Recognizing the entrepreneurial trade genes of Yiwu’s people, it positioned the service economy as a central strategy during the reform and opening-up period. Government initiatives such as infrastructure development, tax incentives, and standardized market management amplified Yiwu’s potential, transforming the city into a trade hub. By aligning cultural heritage with modern economic strategies, the government enabled the city to thrive in both local and global markets.

The dynamic relationship between the government, society, and market players underpins Yiwu’s success. The government provided stability and scalability, ensuring that market growth remained structured and sustainable. This foundational stability allowed Yiwu to expand beyond local trade into a global commerce powerhouse. Its proactive governance has been widely acknowledged by market participants, fostering a sense of mutual trust and cooperation that ensures long-term development.

Yiwu’s success is not merely a local phenomenon but a model of global trade rooted in local cultural heritage. The city’s development exemplifies how the fusion of social heritage, entrepreneurial innovation, and active governance can create a resilient and scalable economic ecosystem capable of thriving in an increasingly interconnected world.

Source: cphoto, people, xinhua

Warum China im Zeitalter der Hochgeschwindigkeitszüge immer noch Kanäle baut

Tendenzblick
-
0
Warum China im Zeitalter der Hochgeschwindigkeitszüge immer noch Kanäle baut

Chinas neue Kanalbauprojekte erregen große Aufmerksamkeit. In diesem Jahr haben Projekte wie der Pinglu-Kanal zu einem raschen Anstieg der Investitionen in die Binnenschifffahrt geführt und das Wachstum des Anlagevermögens kräftig vorangetrieben. Die Förderung des Kanalbaus stärkt den komparativen Vorteil des Wassertransports, senkt die Logistikkosten, fördert den Handel über Häfen und trägt zu einer qualitativ hochwertigen Entwicklung der Wirtschaft bei.

Chinas Verkehrsinfrastruktur schreitet zügig voran und schafft das größte Hochgeschwindigkeitsnetz der Welt, ausgedehnte Autobahnen und Hafencluster. Der Transport auf dem Wasserweg wird mit Projekten wie dem Jianghuai-Kanal, dem renovierten Hangzhou-Abschnitt des Großen Kanals Peking-Hangzhou und dem Pinglu-Kanal beschleunigt. Neue Initiativen wie die Kanäle Zhejiang-Gan, Gan-Guangdong und Xiang-Gui sind in die Testphase eingetreten und rücken den Kanalbau in den Mittelpunkt des Interesses.

Die Fortschritte bei den Investitionen sind bemerkenswert. Allein im ersten Quartal wurden 6,37 Milliarden US-Dollar in den Wassertransport investiert, im gesamten ersten Halbjahr waren es 13,83 Milliarden US-Dollar und am Ende des dritten Quartals bereits 20,74 Milliarden US-Dollar. Projekte wie der Pinglu-Kanal sind ein Beispiel für dieses rasante Wachstum, das den Kanalbau zu einem wichtigen Motor für Investitionen in Verkehrsinfrastruktur macht.

Warum ist der Bau von Kanälen in großem Maßstab überhaupt noch notwendig, wenn es doch den Hochgeschwindigkeitsverkehr auf der Schiene gibt?

Mehrere Kanäle beschleunigen die Umsetzung des Nord-Süd-Wassertransportprojekts

Chinas neues Kanalbauprogramm verändert die Wasserverkehrslandschaft und verbindet moderne Technologie mit jahrhundertealter Infrastruktur, um Vernetzung und Wirtschaftswachstum voranzutreiben. Im Bezirk Qinzhou Lingshan in der Provinz Guangxi steht der Pinglu-Kanal im Mittelpunkt dieser Bemühungen, und die Bauarbeiten am Knotenpunkt Madao sind in vollem Gange.

Nach Angaben von He Junhui, Minister für Ingenieurwesen der Pinglu Kanal Unternehmensgruppe, wurden bereits 60 % des Gesamtprojektplans umgesetzt, rund 240 Millionen Kubikmeter Erde und Gestein bewegt und 76 % des geplanten Fortschritts erreicht. Mit einem Investitionsvolumen von bisher 5,89 Mrd. US-Dollar nähert sich der Kanal zügig seinem Ziel, eine Wasserstraße von Weltrang zu werden.

Neben dem Bau neuer Kanäle werden in China auch historische Kanäle wiederbelebt. Der Große Kanal zwischen Peking und Hangzhou, eine wichtige Verkehrsader mit einer mehr als tausendjährigen Geschichte, wurde erheblich verbessert. Das Projekt der zweiten Wasserstraße im Abschnitt Zaozhuang steht kurz vor der Fertigstellung, der Abschnitt Suqian in Jiangsu hat seine Schifffahrtskapazität erhöht und der Abschnitt Hangzhou in der Provinz Zhejiang wurde für Schiffe mit einer Tragfähigkeit von 1.000 Tonnen wiedereröffnet.

Diese Erneuerungen sind Teil einer umfassenderen nationalen Strategie zur Modernisierung der Binnenschifffahrt und zur Verbesserung der Anbindung wichtiger Regionen. Projekte wie der Xianggui-Kanal in Hunan, der den Jangtsekiang mit dem Perlfluss verbindet, und die Kanäle Zhejiang-Gan und Gan-Guangdong, die das Jangtsekiang-Delta, das Perlflussdelta und das Hinterland von Jiangxi miteinander verbinden sollen, zeigen die zunehmende Dynamik bei der Planung und dem Bau von Kanälen.

Diese Dynamik verdeutlicht eine strategische Wende in Chinas Herangehensweise an die Binnenschifffahrt. Wie Yang Liang, Direktor und Ingenieur des chinesischen Verkehrsplanungs- und Forschungsinstituts des Verkehrsministeriums, erklärt, liegt der Schwerpunkt auf dem Ausbau der Verbindungen zwischen den fragmentierten Wassersystemen. Durch die Verbesserung der Verbindungen zwischen großen Flüssen wie dem Jangtse, dem Perlfluss und dem Huaihe und deren Integration mit Kanalprojekten legt China den Grundstein für ein zusammenhängendes Wassertransportnetz.

Im Jahr 2023 haben die Nationale Entwicklungs- und Reformkommission (NDRC) und das Verkehrsministerium (MOT) den Plan „Vier Vertikale, vier Horizontale und zwei Netzwerke“ vorgestellt, mit dem ein qualitativ hochwertiges Wasserstraßennetz geschaffen werden soll. Die „Vier Vertikalen“ – der Große Kanal Peking-Hangzhou, der Jianghuai-Kanal, der Xianggui-Kanal und der Pinglu-Kanal – werden wichtige Nord-Süd-Korridore bilden, die die bestehende Straßen- und Schieneninfrastruktur ergänzen und gleichzeitig den regionalen Handel und die wirtschaftliche Integration fördern.

Die Bemühungen um den Ausbau und die Modernisierung der Kanäle werden sowohl durch die nationale Planung als auch durch lokale Maßnahmen unterstützt. Wichtige Studien für Projekte wie den Xianggui-Kanal und den Gan-Yue-Kanal wurden abgeschlossen, und die Provinzregierungen vertiefen aktiv ihre Forschungen, um entsprechende Initiativen voranzutreiben. Zhejiang hat bereits mit thematischen Studien für sein Kanalsystem begonnen, während zusätzliche Forschungsarbeiten für die Kanäle Jinghan und Songliao im Gange sind. Diese Projekte zielen darauf ab, seit langem bestehende logistische Herausforderungen zu bewältigen, Kosten zu senken und die komparativen Vorteile der Binnenschifffahrt zu nutzen.

Nutzung der Vorteile der Binnenschifffahrt zur Förderung des regionalen Wirtschaftswachstums

Chinas ehrgeizige Kanalbauprojekte mit Gesamtinvestitionen von fast 137 Milliarden US-Dollar in den Provinzen unterstreichen die strategische Verlagerung hin zur Optimierung seiner Verkehrsinfrastruktur. Trotz eines robusten Schienennetzes von über 160.000 Kilometern – davon 46.000 Kilometer Hochgeschwindigkeitsstrecken – unterstreicht der Fokus auf Kanäle deren einzigartige Vorteile bei der Senkung von Logistikkosten und der Förderung des regionalen Handels. 

Der Transport auf Binnenwasserstraßen ist äußerst kostengünstig, da die durchschnittlichen Frachtkosten pro Tonnenkilometer etwa ein Viertel der Kosten des Schienentransports und ein Fünfzehntel der Kosten des Straßentransports betragen. Ein Frachtschiff mit einer Kapazität von 10.000 Tonnen entspricht beispielsweise 100 Eisenbahnwaggons oder 400 großen Lastwagen. Yang Liang betont die Fähigkeit der Kanäle, durch die Verbindung getrennter natürlicher Wasserwege kostengünstige Transportwege mit hoher Kapazität zu schaffen. Dieser Ansatz verbessert nicht nur die Effizienz der Logistik, sondern reduziert auch die Emissionen erheblich und macht den Transport auf dem Wasser zu einer umweltfreundlichen Alternative.

Ein Beispiel für diese Vorteile ist der Große Kanal zwischen Peking und Hangzhou. Im nördlichen Abschnitt des Kanals können durch den Transport von Gütern von Suzhou nach Shanghai per Schiff über den Kanal 70 bis 80 Prozent der Kosten im Vergleich zum Straßentransport eingespart werden. Jährlich sparen Unternehmen auf dieser Strecke 33,18 Millionen US-Dollar. In ähnlicher Weise hat die vollständige Eröffnung des Jianghuai-Kanals im August 2023 die Logistik optimiert, indem der Huaihe-Fluss mit dem großen Peking-Hangzhou-Kanal verbunden wurde, wodurch Umwege vermieden und die Fahrten um 200 bis 600 Kilometer verkürzt wurden. Diese Veränderung reduziert die Logistikkosten für Industrieunternehmen entlang der Strecke um 5 bis 10 %.

Neben den Kosteneinsparungen spielen die Kanäle eine entscheidende Rolle bei der Förderung der regionalen Wirtschaftsentwicklung und des Handelswachstums entlang ihrer Routen. Professor Xu Xudong von der Southeast University betont, dass Kanäle die Verteilung von Wasserressourcen optimieren, indem sie bisher unabhängige Wasserwege miteinander verbinden. Diese Integration erleichtert nicht nur den Binnen- und Küstenhandel, sondern fördert auch die Entwicklung von Logistikzentren und Handelskorridoren. So hat sich zum Beispiel der Hafen Liangshan in Shandong, der früher vom Kohlehandel abgeschnitten war, innerhalb von drei Jahren zu einem Kohleumschlagplatz entwickelt, der den großen Beijing-Hangzhou-Kanal nutzt. Heute betreibt der Shandong-Abschnitt des Kanals 24 Containerrouten, die mehr als 50 Häfen miteinander verbinden und die Region als potenziellen Handelsknotenpunkt für Massengüter positionieren.

Der Pinglu-Kanal veranschaulicht diese Transformationseffekte noch deutlicher. In der Vergangenheit mussten Güter aus Südwestchina oft den Umweg über das Perlflussdelta nehmen. Nach seiner Fertigstellung wird der Pinglu-Kanal den Seeweg für Güter aus Guangxi um mehr als 560 Kilometer verkürzen und die wirtschaftliche Integration der Region mit dem Golf von Beibu erheblich verbessern.

Diese groß angelegten Kanalprojekte verändern das Transport- und Handelsökosystem Chinas, indem sie Kosteneffizienz und nachhaltige Entwicklung miteinander in Einklang bringen und gleichzeitig die regionale wirtschaftliche Koordination fördern.

Beschleunigter Ausbau eines qualitativ hochwertigen Binnenwasserstraßennetzes

Kanäle sind wichtige Verkehrsadern und spielen eine entscheidende Rolle für die wirtschaftliche und infrastrukturelle Entwicklung Chinas. Die Revitalisierung des Großen Kanals von Beijing nach Hangzhou ist ein Beispiel für diese Dynamik. Der einst als veraltet betrachtete Kanal wurde umgestaltet, indem die Wasserstraßenkapazität und die Verkehrsinfrastruktur erheblich ausgebaut wurden. Im Jahr 2023 wurden in den Häfen entlang des Kanals 750 Millionen Tonnen Fracht umgeschlagen, was einer Steigerung von 9,6 % gegenüber dem Vorjahr entspricht und den Kanal an die zweite Stelle hinter den Systemen des Jangtse und des Perlflusses setzt. Der Abschnitt Suzhou Nord, ein wichtiges „goldenes Segment“, verzeichnete mit 313.000 Schleusungen und einem Güterumschlag von 1,73 Milliarden Tonnen eine Rekordaktivität, was die Widerstandsfähigkeit und Vitalität der Binnenschifffahrt unterstreicht.

Der Bau und die Planung neuer Kanäle erhöhen die Effizienz des chinesischen Wassertransportnetzes. Wie Yang Liang betont, verlaufen die Hauptflüsse Chinas zwar hauptsächlich in Ost-West-Richtung, aber die Nord-Süd-Ausdehnung der Nebenflüsse durch Kanäle verbindet tief liegende Regionen im Hinterland. Jahrelange Entwicklungsarbeit hat den Grundstein für ein vertikal integriertes Wasserstraßensystem gelegt, das große Flüsse wie den Jangtsekiang, den Perlfluss und den Huaihe durch Kanalnetze miteinander verbindet. Diese Vernetzung erweitert die Reichweite der Binnenschifffahrt und nutzt ihre Vorteile wie hohe Kapazität, niedrige Kosten und geringen Energieverbrauch.

Mit Blick auf die Zukunft ist Chinas zunehmend integriertes Wasserstraßennetz auf dem besten Weg, eine tragende Säule der qualitativ hochwertigen wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung zu werden. Yang Liang betont die Notwendigkeit systematischer Planung und wissenschaftlicher Ansätze, um Herausforderungen wie Landnutzung, Umweltschutz und Umsiedlung zu bewältigen. Projekte, die das Jangtse-Flusssystem mit anderen Flüssen wie dem Perlfluss, dem Qiantang und dem Huaihe verbinden, müssen sorgfältig geplant werden, um erfolgreich zu sein. Wenn diese miteinander verbundenen Wasserstraßen realisiert werden, werden sie die regionale Erreichbarkeit verbessern, die wirtschaftliche Widerstandsfähigkeit unterstützen und die Rolle der Kanäle als Motor für nachhaltiges Wachstum stärken.

Quelle: nanning gov cn, people’s daily

Auf dem Weg zur Modernisierung von Wissenschaft und Technik in China

Tendenzblick
-
0
Auf dem Weg zur Modernisierung von Wissenschaft und Technik in China

Die Modernisierung von Wissenschaft und Technologie in China ist ein zentraler Bestandteil der allgemeinen Entwicklungsziele des Landes. Die Vision des damaligen Premierministers Zhou Enlai aus dem Jahr 1964 unterstrich die Bedeutung moderner Wissenschaft und Technologie für die Entwicklung der Landwirtschaft, der Industrie und der Landesverteidigung. Später betonte Deng Xiaoping, dass Wissenschaft und Technologie der Schlüssel zur Modernisierung Chinas seien. Auch Staatspräsident Xi Jinping betont heute die Rolle der Innovation als Motor für eine hochqualitative Entwicklung. Von der Übernahme westlicher Wissenschaften zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts bis zum heutigen Fokus auf Eigenständigkeit war der wissenschaftliche Fortschritt Chinas ein wesentlicher Bestandteil der nationalen Modernisierung.

Grundlagen und frühes Wachstum der wissenschaftlich-technischen Modernisierung (1949-1976)

Von 1949 bis 1976 konzentrierte sich die wissenschaftliche Modernisierung Chinas auf die Sicherung des sozialistischen Aufbaus und der Landesverteidigung im Rahmen einer Planwirtschaft. Die 1949 gegründete Chinesische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS) wurde zu einer zentralen Institution, die sich rasch ausdehnte und maßgeblich das Forschungssystem des Landes prägte. Die frühe Politik, die sich an der Sowjetunion orientierte, betonte die Ausrichtung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung auf praktische Bedürfnisse, woraufhin China Studenten in die UdSSR schickte, um etwas über Forschungsplanung und akademische Zusammenarbeit zu lernen.

In den 1950er Jahren führte das CAS Postgraduiertenprogramme ein, die eine neue Generation von Wissenschaftlern hervorbrachten. Der erste nationale Fünfjahresplan (1953) kurbelte die Nachfrage nach Wissenschaft und Technologie an und mündete in den “Plan zur wissenschaftlichen und technologischen Entwicklung für die Jahre 1956-1967”, der darauf abzielte, Chinas wissenschaftlichen Rückstand gegenüber der Welt aufzuholen. Dieser „aufgabenbasierte“ Ansatz konzentrierte sich auf 57 wesentliche Bedürfnisse des Landes und förderte Schlüsselsektoren wie Atomenergie, Elektronik und Automatisierung. Trotz Rückschlägen durch politische Kampagnen trugen die Reformen von 1961 zur Wiederbelebung der chinesischen Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft bei.

Der „Plan für die Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technologie 1963-1972“ legte den Schwerpunkt auf Autonomie und Innovation und erzielte bemerkenswerte Fortschritte in der Verteidigungstechnologie und der industriellen Infrastruktur. Obwohl die Kulturrevolution den wissenschaftlichen Fortschritt unterbrach, wurden weiterhin bedeutende Durchbrüche erzielt, darunter Satellitenstarts, die Entwicklung von Hybridreis und die Entdeckung von Artemisinin.

Die internationale Wissenschaftskooperation Chinas begann mit der Sowjetunion und weitete sich auf Osteuropa, westliche Länder und später Japan und die USA aus. Dieser internationale Austausch, einschließlich des Auslandsstudienprogramms in der UdSSR, spielte eine Schlüsselrolle für den wissenschaftlichen Fortschritt Chinas.

Transformation in der Reform- und Öffnungsperiode (1977-1994)

Mit dem Nationalen Wissenschaftskongress im März 1978, auf dem Deng Xiaoping die Bedeutung von Wissenschaft und Technologie für die Modernisierung betonte, begann die wissenschaftliche Transformation Chinas. Dies führte zu Wirtschaftsreformen, bei denen Wissenschaft und Technologie in die nationale Entwicklung integriert wurden.

Der Achtjahresplan (1978-1985) zielte darauf ab, die wissenschaftliche Lücke zu schließen, stieß jedoch aufgrund der mangelnden Integration in das Wirtschaftswachstum auf Schwierigkeiten. 1980 wurde eine neue Politik eingeführt, die Wissenschaft und Technologie mit der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung in Einklang brachte. Bis 1982 konzentrierten sich die nationalen Programme auf Schlüsselbereiche wie Landwirtschaft und Energie.

Die internationale Zusammenarbeit spielte eine entscheidende Rolle, einschließlich der Kooperation zwischen den USA und China beim Beijing Positron Negative Electron Collider (BPEC), der Chinas Einstieg in die Hochenergiephysik markierte. Dengs Vision von Hochtechnologie wurde durch Projekte wie der BPEC und erhebliche Investitionen in die Infrastruktur Wirklichkeit.

In den 1980er Jahren reformierte China sein Wissenschaftssystem und gründete 1986 die National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) zur Finanzierung der Grundlagenforschung. Private Wissenschafts- und Technologieunternehmen wie Lenovo wurden gegründet, um die technologische Modernisierung zu unterstützen.

Hochtechnologie, einschließlich IT, Biotechnologie und neue Materialien, wurde zu einem entscheidenden Faktor im globalen Wettbewerb. Als Reaktion auf Initiativen wie die US Strategic Defense Initiative startete China 1987 den „863“-Plan, um Hochtechnologie auf nationaler Ebene zu entwickeln.

Die Chinesische Akademie der Wissenschaften (CAS) spielte eine Schlüsselrolle in der Politikgestaltung, während gesetzliche Änderungen, darunter das Gesetz zum wissenschaftlichen und technologischen Fortschritt von 1993, einen rechtlichen Rahmen für Innovationen und Technologietransaktionen schufen.

Umstrukturierung und Reform des chinesischen Wissenschafts- und Technologiesystems (1995-2005)

1992 brachte Deng Xiaopings Dialog mit dem Süden die Reform Chinas voran und leitete eine neue Phase der Modernisierung ein. 1995 fassten das Zentralkomitee der Kommunistischen Partei Chinas und der Staatsrat einen Beschluss zur Beschleunigung von Wissenschaft und Technologie und betonten die Strategie der Wiederbelebung des Landes durch Wissenschaft und Bildung. 1996 nahm der Staatsrat eine umfassende Reform des Wissenschafts- und Technologiesystems vor und konzentrierte sich dabei auf die Forschungseinrichtungen der Zentralregierung.

In den 1990er Jahren gab es eine zunehmende Diskussion über Reformen in Wissenschaft und Technologie, beeinflusst durch das Konzept des Nationalen Innovationssystems (NIS), das 1995 von der Nationalen Kommission für Wissenschaft und Technologie und dem kanadischen IDRC eingeführt wurde. 1997 legte die Chinesische Akademie der Wissenschaften (CAS) einen Bericht über den Aufbau eines nationalen Innovationssystems vor, der vom Zentralkomitee der Kommunistischen Partei Chinas gebilligt wurde. Das 1998 gestartete „Knowledge Innovation Project“ reformierte die Chinesische Akademie der Wissenschaften und wurde zum Vorbild für andere Institutionen.

1995 startete China das „211-Projekt“ zur Stärkung der Universitäten. Das 1999 gestartete „985 Project“ zielte auf die Schaffung von Universitäten von Weltrang ab und umfasste bis 2004 39 Hochschulen. Darüber hinaus hat China in den Jahren 1999 und 2000 über 240 Forschungsinstitute umstrukturiert, ein Prozess, der die Entwicklung von Schlüsseltechnologien zwar gebremst, aber das Wirtschaftswachstum angekurbelt hat.

1997 wurde der Nationale Plan zur Entwicklung der Grundlagenforschung (973-Plan) formuliert, der sich auf langfristige nationale Bedürfnisse und wissenschaftliche Herausforderungen konzentrierte. Bis 2008 war der Erfolg des 973-Plans offensichtlich, da er die Grundlagenforschung in die nationale Strategie integrierte, das Niveau der wissenschaftlichen Forschung anhob und einen starken Pool an Forschungstalenten schuf, der die interdisziplinäre und angewandte Forschung förderte.

Aufbau des Systems zur Modernisierung von Wissenschaft und Technologie (2006-2020)

Mit dem 2006 verabschiedeten Entwurf des Nationalen Mittel- und Langfristigen Plans zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technologie (2006-2020) wurden die Voraussetzungen für Chinas nationales Innovationssystem geschaffen, mit dem Ziel, ein innovationsstarkes Land zu werden. Es folgten verschiedene Strategiepapiere wie die „Ansichten zur Vertiefung der Reform des Wissenschafts- und Technologiesystems“ (2012) und die „Skizze der nationalen Strategie für innovationsgetriebene Entwicklung“ (2016), in denen die Bedeutung des Aufbaus dieses Innovationssystems unterstrichen wurde.

Der Entwurf des Plans von 2006 knüpft an frühere langfristige Wissenschafts- und Technologiestrategien an. Er betont die Ziele der unabhängigen Innovation, der strategischen Entwicklungssprünge, der Förderung von Entwicklung und der zukünftigen Führung in Wissenschaft und Technologie. Die Ausarbeitung des Plans wurde durch umfangreiche Forschungsarbeiten unter Beteiligung von mehr als 2.000 Experten und Bewertungen durch renommierte akademische Institutionen unterstützt. Diese Forschung schuf eine solide Grundlage für die Entwicklung, die auf der aufstrebenden sozialistischen Marktwirtschaft, der industriellen Basis und der internationalen Zusammenarbeit Chinas beruhte.

Der Plan setzte verschiedene Handlungsinstrumente erfolgreich um, darunter Fünfjahrespläne für Wissenschaft und Technologie, Forschungsprogramme und Großprojekte. Bemerkenswerte Erfolge sind die bemannte Raumfahrt und die Initiativen zur Erforschung des Mondes. Weitere Schwerpunkte des Plans waren der Aufbau eines nationalen Innovationssystems, die Förderung der sektorübergreifenden Zusammenarbeit und die Stärkung der technologischen Basis Chinas.

Im Jahr 2014 leitete der Staatsrat eine Reform der Verwaltung der Wissenschafts- und Technologieprogramme ein, um die Ressourcenallokation und Effizienz zu verbessern. Darauf folgte der 13. Fünfjahresplan (2016), der eine nachhaltige Unterstützung der interdisziplinären und kooperativen Forschung vorschlug, um strategische wissenschaftliche Kräfte von Weltklasse aufzubauen.

Darüber hinaus wurden durch die Einrichtung großer nationaler Wissenschaftszentren in Städten wie Shanghai, Hefei und Peking Innovationsplattformen gestärkt und das nationale Innovationssystem unterstützt. Die chinesische Regierung hat auch der Entwicklung neuer Denkfabriken zur Unterstützung der wissenschaftlichen Entscheidungsfindung Priorität eingeräumt.

Insgesamt wurde die nationale Innovationsstrategie Chinas kontinuierlich verfeinert, wobei der Schwerpunkt zunehmend auf Zusammenarbeit, strategischer Führung und dem Aufbau eines robusten wissenschaftlichen und technologischen Beratungssystems zur Unterstützung politischer Entscheidungen lag. Dieser umfassende Ansatz hat China geholfen, sowohl beim wissenschaftlichen Fortschritt als auch bei der Technologieführerschaft bedeutende Fortschritte zu erzielen.

Förderung der Modernisierung von Wissenschaft und Technologie zur Stärkung der Nation (seit 2021)

Der im März 2021 verabschiedete 14. Fünfjahresplan und die Vision 2035 legen den Hauptakzent auf Innovation und positionieren die wissenschaftliche und technologische Autonomie als zentralen Schwerpunkt der chinesischen Entwicklungsstrategie. Er befürwortet eine strategische Ausrichtung auf Wissenschaft und Technologie, um das Wirtschaftswachstum zu fördern und die Lebensqualität der Bevölkerung zu verbessern. Der Schlüssel zu dieser Vision ist die Entwicklung eines robusten nationalen Innovationssystems und die Schaffung eines starken Wissenschafts- und Technologielandes.

Der 20. Parteitag der KPCh im Oktober 2022 hat das Ziel unterstrichen, China zu einer weltweit führenden Kraft in Wissenschaft und Technologie zu machen. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, müssen nicht nur die technologischen Fähigkeiten verbessert, sondern auch ein Umfeld geschaffen werden, in dem Bildung, Wissenschaft und Humanressourcen als Grundlage für Modernisierung und nationale Stärke dienen.

Die strategische Ausrichtung für die nächsten fünf Jahre konzentriert sich auf vier Schlüsselbereiche:

1. Stärkung der strategischen wissenschaftlichen und technologischen Kapazitäten des Landes.

2. Verbesserung der Innovationsfähigkeit der Unternehmen

3. Förderung des Innovationspotenzials von Talenten.

4. Verbesserung des wissenschaftlichen und technologischen Systems und der Prozesse.

Zu den wichtigsten Initiativen gehört die Einrichtung nationaler Laboratorien und hochrangiger Forschungseinrichtungen. Die Chinesische Akademie der Wissenschaften (CAS) und führende Universitäten wie die Tsinghua-Universität und die Peking-Universität nehmen in den weltweiten wissenschaftlichen Rankings herausragende Positionen ein, was die Fortschritte Chinas auf dem Weg zur Technologieführerschaft unterstreicht.

Das Thema ethische Governance in Wissenschaft und Technologie gewinnt zunehmend an Aufmerksamkeit, insbesondere in innovativen Bereichen wie der künstlichen Intelligenz (KI). China hat sich proaktiv an der Entwicklung globaler ethischer KI-Standards beteiligt, darunter der New Generation AI Code of Ethics von 2019 und die Global Initiative on AI von 2023.

Die Reform der Wissenschafts- und Technologiepolitik, die sich im Reformprogramm des Staatsrats von 2023 widerspiegelt, zielt darauf ab, die Führung zu zentralisieren und gleichzeitig die Managementverantwortung zu dezentralisieren, um die Effizienz des technologischen Fortschritts zu steigern.

Die letzten 75 Jahre der wissenschaftlichen Entwicklung Chinas haben gezeigt, dass ein Gleichgewicht zwischen Autonomie und internationaler Zusammenarbeit von entscheidender Bedeutung ist. In Zukunft wird es für China von zentraler Relevanz sein, einheimische Talente zu fördern, solide rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen zu gewährleisten und ein innovationsfreundliches Umfeld zu schaffen. Daher wird sich die Modernisierung von Wissenschaft und Technologie in China weiterhin auf die Bewältigung nationaler Herausforderungen konzentrieren und gleichzeitig zum globalen Fortschritt beitragen.

Quelle: OMFIF, CGTN, Xinhua

Chinese Company Earns $55.31 Million from Selling Second-hand Clothes in Africa

Tendenzblick
-
0
Chinese Company Earns $55.31 Million from Selling Second-hand Clothes in Africa

Walking through the streets of Africa, one will often spot striking Chinese phrases on clothing. A young man selling goods on the side wears a blue T-shirt with the phrase, “Order takeout, go to Ele.me” on the back, while a girl on a bicycle sports a light yellow shirt that says, “Cross Shenzhen,” and black pants with “Run, Brothers.” These bold Chinese characters are not local designs—they’re second-hand clothes from China that have made their way across the ocean.

Every year, millions of tons of discarded clothes flood Africa’s market, supporting a business worth billions. In 2023, global second-hand clothing sales hit $211 billion, growing by 19% from the previous year. By 2024, Africa’s clothing market alone reached $70.58 billion, growing at a rate of 5.16% annually.

This booming market has attracted many Chinese entrepreneurs. In 2010, Guo Song, a college student, began collecting discarded military training uniforms from classmates and reselling them to training centers. This side hustle ignited his interest in the second-hand clothing business.

In 2016, Guo Song and his team founded Gracer in Guangzhou. They use big data and logistics networks to collect, sort, and package domestic textiles, then export them to Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond. Gracer processes tens of thousands of tons of second-hand clothing each year, with over 60% of its exports going to Africa. In 2023, the company’s transactions exceeded $55.31 million.

Africa has become the world’s largest market for second-hand clothing. In Kenya, for example, Nairobi’s bustling second-hand market is a central hub, with clothes passing through daily. In 2021, China became the largest exporter of second-hand clothing to Africa, accounting for over 40% of Kenya’s imports. With new clothes often out of reach for most African consumers, second-hand items have become a staple. In countries like Uganda and Tanzania, second-hand clothing not only meets basic needs but provides jobs and sustains local economies.

Despite opposition from some governments, which argue that second-hand imports harm local industries, the demand for affordable clothes is undeniable. In economically struggling regions, second-hand clothes are a lifeline. Guo Song notes that the market will persist as long as there’s demand—until people can afford new clothes, second-hand items will always be necessary.

But doing business in Africa isn’t without its challenges. Guo Song faced resistance when he expanded Gracer into Uganda, where local dealers felt threatened by foreign competition. Despite initial setbacks, including issues with customs and local collaboration, Guo Song’s team managed to scale to a monthly revenue of $1.38 million within six months. Yet, after three years, the Uganda operation collapsed, prompting a return to China.

The complexities of managing staff and operations abroad, combined with the lack of a compliant business environment, made it clear to Guo Song that while the product could thrive in Africa, building a sustainable operation there was far more difficult. In the end, he focused on refining the domestic supply chain to improve product quality and streamline logistics.

Now, Gracer has established a robust recycling and processing network across China, handling over 200 varieties of clothing in 245 cities. Guo Song remains committed to eventually re-entering Africa, once the company’s domestic operations are fully digitized. After all, a successful overseas venture requires deep local engagement—something he still plans to pursue.

Source: Gracer

The Dark Link Between Sexual Misogyny and Deepfake Pornography in South Korea

Tendenzblick
-
0
The Dark Link Between Sexual Misogyny and Deepfake Pornography in South Korea

The Deepfake Crisis in South Korea, which came to light through a tweet by S.K Feminist on 25 August 2024, reveals a growing crisis involving the use of artificial intelligence to create pornographic videos that exploit the images of ordinary people. The victims include military personnel, students, and healthcare workers, with the issue extending from previous scandals such as the Nth Room case of 2022 and a related incident at Seoul National University in 2024. The public outcry following the exposure of these deepfake crimes has attracted global attention, especially after coverage on Korean TV and in newspapers.

In response, President Yoon Suk-yeol called for an investigation into the matter, and the National Assembly passed an amendment to the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes on 26 September 2024. The law, once approved by the president, aims to punish the possession, distribution, and consumption of AI-generated deepfake pornography with up to three years in prison or a fine of up to $21,000. The punishment for producers of such videos will increase, with sentences potentially reaching up to seven years following the amendment. However, the law’s effectiveness remains uncertain, as it is unclear whether it can address the underlying social and cultural issues at play.

The flow of events in South Korea often follows a predictable pattern of social crises, dramatic responses, and subsequent legislative measures. While legislation is an important step, its ability to bring about real change remains questionable. This raises the existential question: if such measures fail to protect individuals and prevent harm, can they ultimately save the fabric of South Korean society?

South Korea’s problem with Internet-based sexual exploitation is deeply ingrained and difficult to eradicate. The country’s high-speed internet, widespread access, and large percentage of users provide an environment where such crimes thrive. This is compounded by a culture of small groups and social conformity, where the widespread use of social software, including image sharing and deepfake videos, facilitates exploitation. Despite technological advances, the legal framework in South Korea has been slow to address issues like consent in sexual crimes, offering lenient penalties and enabling repeated offenses. Additionally, South Korea’s historical tolerance of sex work and distorted sexual values have not fundamentally shifted with legal reforms, leaving the sex trade and exploitation in a gray area.

Socially influential groups, such as entertainers, also struggle to address the lack of deterrents for exploitation, as the regulation of their image rights remains weak. Even when deepfake pornography first emerged in 2017, prominent victims like Scarlett Johansson chose not to pursue legal action, with similar responses from Korean celebrities, further perpetuating the normalization of such crimes. This reluctance to recognize the harm caused by deepfake pornography has shaped public perception, with many dismissing it as “fake” and thus harmless. 

As a result, South Korea has become a hotspot for deepfake pornography, with a significant portion of global victims being Korean women. The number of such cases has steadily increased, with underage involvement rising sharply in recent years. The root cause of this issue lies in a society steeped in misogyny, where changing the legal framework and increasing penalties may not be enough. Only a radical shift in South Korea’s political and social systems can truly address the deep-seated nature of these crimes.

The issue of internet sexual exploitation crimes in South Korea, particularly deepfake pornography, is closely intertwined with the country’s complex socio-political dynamics. These crimes are a manifestation of the deep-seated misogyny that permeates South Korean society, stemming from both traditional Confucian values and the exacerbating influence of wartime military nationalism. The normalization of male dominance, coupled with the proliferation of deepfake technology, allows for the sexual exploitation of women without direct physical involvement, creating a dangerous global reach for these crimes.

The rise of such crimes coincided with significant political changes in South Korea, particularly following the election of President Moon Jae-in in 2017. With the feminist movement gaining momentum globally, the backlash from conservative and anti-feminist groups intensified, particularly targeting the increasing recognition of women’s rights. This backlash was amplified by the spread of deepfake pornography and the creation of online forums where these exploitative materials were shared. In this context, technology became a tool for perpetuating gender-based violence, allowing men to coerce and exploit women remotely, bypassing traditional societal structures.

In parallel, South Korea’s mandatory military service system, which is a unique aspect of the country’s gendered social structure, further entrenches male privilege. Military service, viewed as a form of patriotism and a rite of passage for men, elevates male status in society. However, the rigid and often violent nature of military life, combined with the economic challenges faced by men after service, has led to resentment and a growing sense of male victimhood. This sentiment has contributed to the growing opposition to feminist movements, as men feel they are being unfairly disadvantaged by policies that promote gender equality.

The complex interplay of these factors has created a cyclical pattern of misogyny and gender-based violence in South Korea. The rise of deepfake pornography crimes, in particular, reflects a societal shift where technology is exploited to amplify traditional gender hierarchies and male power dynamics. This phenomenon is further compounded by the political manipulation of gender conflicts, with some political leaders using the divisive issue of gender equality to rally male voters.

The long-term consequences of these trends are far-reaching. South Korea’s declining fertility rate, driven by economic pressures and unresolved gender conflicts, threatens the country’s future stability. The government’s failure to address these issues from a gender-sensitive perspective has deepened the divide, leaving women caught between multiple sources of oppression. Ultimately, to break the cycle of misogyny and combat the exploitation enabled by deepfake technology, a fundamental shift in South Korea’s social, political, and cultural structures is necessary. This includes dismantling the systems that perpetuate gender inequality and ensuring that women’s rights and voices are given due recognition in both policy and society.

Source: BBC, Nikkei Asia

How China Chenghai Commands a Third of Global Toy Production

Tendenzblick
-
0
How China Chenghai Commands a Third of Global Toy Production

The global toy industry looks to China, and China’s toy industry looks to Chenghai. Walking through Chenghai, toy brand stores line the streets, and rows of towering buildings house over 50,000 toy production and management units, cultivating industry leaders like Sunfun Toys, Alpha Animation and Culture, Rastar Group, and Sembao Blocks. In 2023, the industry’s revenue exceeded $6.98 billion.

Known as China’s Toy and Gift Capital, Chenghai has developed a comprehensive industry chain from R&D and design to manufacturing and trade. The district produces half of China’s plastic toys, with the nation’s highest number of authorized brands, IPs, and patents, launching over 300,000 new toys annually for export to more than 120 countries. In 2024, Chenghai’s Toy Creative Industry Cluster was recognized as a specialty industrial cluster in Guangdong Province for small and medium-sized enterprises.

Despite this success, Chenghai’s toy industry faces challenges of low overall quality and homogeneous competition. As international competition intensifies, many Chenghai companies are shifting from contract manufacturing to building their own brands, moving up the value chain to higher-end segments.

Toy Factories Embrace Digital Intelligence

In Moyu Cube’s exhibition hall, there is an array of Rubik’s Cubes, including various types like traditional, anisotropic, magnetic, maglev, and AI-enhanced models, spanning hundreds of styles. “We’ve embedded Bluetooth chips, sensors, and gyroscopes in our Rubik’s Cubes, allowing users to follow guided steps for solving the cube and learning formulas,” explained Yang Jiandong, Moyu Cube’s marketing director. Since 2016, the company has utilized a fully automated production line, where AI-enabled machines have boosted production efficiency by 80 times. Moyu Cube’s digital upgrades reflect the broader transformation underway in Chenghai’s toy industry.

Huang Liang, Executive Vice President of the Shantou Chenghai District Toy Association, highlighted that in the 21st century, Chenghai’s toy sector adopted CNC machine tools, automated CNC injection molding machines, and other advanced equipment, resulting in large-scale production and industry clustering. Today, Chenghai has developed China’s most complete toy production chain, covering raw materials, R&D, IP creation, manufacturing, sales, and trade. The city’s products span early education, blocks, video games, and remote-controlled toys, producing one-third of the world’s and nearly half of China’s plastic toys.

Data from Shantou’s Bureau of Industry and Information Technology show that in 2023, Shantou’s 264 toy and creative companies generated an industrial output value of $4.31 billion, accounting for 8.8% of the city’s regulated industries, with an added value of $990 million.

Hong Kong’s Chen Hsong Holdings, a global leader in injection molding machinery, entered Chenghai in 2000. Over two decades, Chen Hsong’s machines have evolved from quantitative and variable injection models to servo and all-electric versions, aligning with Chenghai’s toy industry’s advancements. In 2016, Chen Hsong launched a specialized machine for building blocks and educational toys, capturing 50% of the local market and establishing Chenghai’s first smart factory in 2019 with local partners.

“With 12,000 injection molding machines in Chenghai, the toy industry has largely automated and is moving toward digital, intelligent production,” noted Chen Jianbo, a senior manager at Chen Hsong. Chen Hsong now holds a 60% local market share and up to 85% in sectors like blocks and Rubik’s Cubes. The company is exploring AI models for the toy industry, aiming to improve quality and yield by using big data for real-time adjustments and enhanced process intelligence.

Moving from Product to IP Overseas

Globally, nearly 75% of toys are IP-based, with popular IPs often driving growth across related industries. Recognizing this potential, Chenghai companies began exploring IP’s value over a decade ago. In 2009, Alpha Animation and Culture went public on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, pioneering the “IP + industry chain” model with popular animation series like Super Wings, ​​Balala the Fairies, Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf, and others.

Chenghai’s toy manufacturers are leveraging the domestic animation IP boom, expanding brands internationally. “Our foreign sales increased 35% this year, reaching $42–56 million,” shared Xie Yipeng, assistant general manager of Guangdong Jianjian Intelligent Technology. By tapping into markets in North America, Europe, and Asia, the company has doubled its overseas sales, responding to demand for remote-controlled vehicles with 30–40 new models annually.

Chenghai exports toys to over 120 countries through multiple channels, controlling about one-third of the world’s toy production. Sembao Blocks, a local leader in block-based toys, has grown through both independent IP and licensed partnerships since 2019, collaborating on themes like the Wandering Earth, Shandong aircraft carrier, CASCI, and Forbidden City Culture. Popular series such as Huayan Tea Language Flower sold 1 million units immediately after launch, achieving $2.8 million in single-product sales.

Chenghai’s “toys + IP” model has fostered numerous top IP-based toy companies, like Sembao Blocks and Rastar Group, giving the district the largest concentration of toy patents in China, with over 10,000 patents authorized each year. 

To support this industry, Chenghai’s government has strengthened IP protections, establishing the country’s only dedicated rapid intellectual property rights center for toys. “Ordinary patent applications take three to five months, but our center’s fast track reduces this to just ten days, a critical advantage for product development and sales,” explained Chen Shunli, Director of Shantou’s (Toys) Intellectual Property Rights Center. This support helps Chenghai’s toy manufacturers thrive in a competitive global market.

Building a New Industrial Ecosystem through Chain Innovation

In the Guangdong Yuxing Technology, a streamlined process unfolds: blocks are sorted into barcode-labeled boxes by 36 robots, while an intelligent platform collects and analyzes production data in the cloud. Six years ago, company founder Xie Weichun, with nearly 20 years in toy manufacturing, saw an urgent need for automation due to labor shortages and quality control challenges. In response, Yuxing partnered with Shantou Gooders Precision Technology in 2018 to create an automated production line, marking a pivotal shift toward intelligent manufacturing.

Michael Porter’s competitive strategy model underscores the importance of new production factors—like skilled talent and research facilities—in bolstering industrial clusters. Chenghai exemplifies this model, evolving from traditional competition to collaborative innovation. Shantou Gooders Precision Technology, founded by Du Kehong in 2017, epitomizes this shift by specializing in precision block toy production through advanced mould-making and large-scale manufacturing. By adopting industrial-scale production and sharing resources like public warehouses, Chenghai’s toy industry has fostered a cooperative, resource-efficient ecosystem.

This collaborative model drives cost-effectiveness and competitiveness: Huang Liang notes that mass production enables Gooders to lower the cost per block to as little as 0.0014 dollar, reducing overall manufacturing costs by over 20%. Through initiatives like shared design spaces and a “community of destiny” for brands, Gooders has positioned Chenghai as a hub for high-end, scalable, and digitally advanced toy manufacturing. Sembao Blocks, one of Gooders’ first partners, leverages this model to sustain a 200-person design team and launch 500 new products annually, achieving a 102% increase in revenue in 2022.

In a broader push for industrial modernization, Shantou Chenghai has formed a plastic precision manufacturing alliance and China Telecom’s Toy Industry Digital Intelligence R&D Center, supporting automated production methods, where factories operate with minimal lighting and human intervention. Chenghai now hosts 78 national high-tech creative toy enterprises and over 40,000 support units, further solidifying its leadership in smart toy manufacturing.

Chenghai is driving digital and green transformations, integrating new information technology and digital trade networks. This chain innovation approach is propelling Chenghai up the “smile curve” of high-value production, reinforcing its status as a global leader in the toy industry’s digital future.

Source: amazon, aliexpress, CGTN, xinhua, guangdong news

Why Has India Struggled to Develop an Electric Car in Eight Years?

Tendenzblick
-
0
Why Has India Struggled to Develop an Electric Car in Eight Years?

On October 12, Ratan Tata, a titan of Indian business, passed away. From Tetley Tea to Jaguar Land Rover and Air India, he fulfilled nearly every goal on his life’s wish list—except for one: the Tata Nano EV. This car became his only regret.

Tata’s ambition throughout his career was to provide affordable, efficient transportation to millions of Indian families. Had the Tata Nano EV succeeded, it could have been a groundbreaking achievement for both India and the global electric vehicle (EV) market. 

In 2015, the Tata Group, in partnership with Indian automotive company Jayem, sought to develop a low-cost electric car, the Jayem Neo EV, which later became known as the Tata Nano EV. Ratan Tata personally oversaw the project, and hopes were high. The Nano EV was designed in two versions: a 48-volt and a 72-volt model. By 2018, Jayem produced 400 units, selling them to Ola Cabs for use in Hyderabad and Bengaluru during the early stages of the pandemic. However, despite the anticipation, the car was never officially launched, and Tata’s company never publicly explained why it was withheld. 

Speculation surrounds the reasons for the Nano EV’s failure, but one key factor is India’s slow pace in adopting electric vehicles. Bhavish Aggarwal, the founder of Ola, has credited Tata as his guiding influence. He recalls a pivotal moment when Tata personally invited him to Coimbatore to test drive the Nano EV prototype. This experience inspired Aggarwal to launch Ola Electric, which today commands a third of India’s electric two-wheeler market, having sold over 300,000 units within three years. In contrast, the electric four-wheeler market has not seen similar growth.

The Nano EV, if it had materialized, would have been positioned as an affordable, compact car with an estimated price range of INR 400,000 to INR 600,000, a speed of 60-70 km/h, and a range of 300 km. Despite these appealing specifications, the car never came to market, leaving behind only unanswered questions.

The Nano EV’s failure is particularly striking given the legacy of its predecessor, the Tata Nano, which was launched in 2009 as one of the world’s cheapest cars, priced at around $9,000 today. The Nano was born from Tata’s vision to provide an affordable alternative to unsafe two-wheelers, sparked by a personal experience where he saw a family riding in the rain on a motorcycle. 

The Nano’s design was a testament to cost-saving innovation: metal was replaced with plastic where possible, glue was substituted for welding, and features were minimal—only one rear-view mirror, hand-cranked windows, no airbags, and a sealed boot. Despite the strong initial demand, with nearly 70% of sales occurring in the first three to four years, fewer than 300,000 units were sold over a decade, in a country with over 1.4 billion people. 

Many analysts argue that the Nano’s failure wasn’t due to its simplicity or safety features, but because of its stigma. In a class-conscious society like India, owning the “cheapest car” was seen as a social liability. Some believe the Nano EV, launched under the same name, would have been similarly tainted. Puneet Gupta, an automotive analyst, suggests that consumer preferences have shifted away from small cars, as reflected in the decline of sales in India’s fuel-car market.

J Anand of Jayem Motors, a key partner in the Nano EV project, has been reluctant to discuss its failure. He cites factors such as government regulations, the COVID-19 pandemic, and stringent crash standards as impediments. While reports suggest that engineers struggled to reduce the cost of the 72-volt version and that the car failed crash tests, Anand has stated that there are no plans to revisit the Nano EV project. 

India, with its vast population and growing market, was once seen as a blue ocean for the automotive industry, but this notion has proven to be false for many international brands. Tesla has yet to deliver an electric car, and Chinese brands, after several attempts, have withdrawn from the market. Despite these struggles, India remains a highly attractive market for electric vehicles. By 2030, the Indian government aims to have 50 million EVs on its roads, with the market size projected to reach $48.6 billion, and electric vehicles expected to account for nearly one-third of the passenger car market.

While the government has expressed strong support for the growth of EVs, the reality is mixed. The highest penetration is in the three-wheeler segment (54%), followed by two-wheelers (6%), while electric four-wheelers account for a negligible share of the market. In FY2023, electric four-wheeler sales were just 90,000 units, or 2% of total vehicle sales, despite doubling year-on-year.

India’s electric vehicle market lags far behind China, which has rapidly expanded its EV offerings. As of July 2024, only 13 Indian automakers had at least one EV model, compared to China’s far more extensive range. Tata, BMW, and Audi lead the Indian market, with Tata capturing nearly two-thirds of the electric passenger car market. However, Maruti Suzuki, the leader of India’s passenger car market, has yet to launch any EV models. Moreover, the electric taxi market in India is underdeveloped, with BluSmart scaling back its ambitious plans for 100,000 electric taxis by 2025 to just 10,000 by early 2024.

Despite these challenges, India’s shift to electrification is inevitable. Hyundai’s new unit in India is set to launch a compact electric car, and Tata is planning to expand its EV lineup in the near future.

China, as a leader in the global electric transition, demonstrated how affordable EVs could become mainstream. The Wuling Hongguang MINI EV, priced at around $4,152, played a key role in this transition. In contrast, India’s EV market still lacks such affordability.

However, in early 2024, as battery costs fell, India began taking steps to make electric vehicles more accessible. The MG Comet EV became the cheapest EV in India, priced at approximately $60,000, while the Tiago EV is priced at around $68,486. Despite these price reductions, the Nano EV remains a highly anticipated model, with rumors circulating that Tata might soon release it.

Reports suggest that Tata could partner with Jayem, an unknown company, to release the Nano EV. While the design, interiors, and exteriors may be identical to the petrol-powered Nano, the logo would change from Tata to Neo. Since Jayem is largely unknown, the Nano EV will likely carry Tata’s legacy. If successful, it would be a triumph for Tata, but if it fails, Jayem would bear the blame, with Tata’s reputation and stock price unaffected.

The new Nano EV represents a significant departure from its predecessor. It includes modern features such as an infotainment system, Bluetooth, six speakers, power steering, power windows, ABS with EBD, and a 7-inch touchscreen. With a range of 100-120 km per charge and a top speed of 80-90 km/h, the Nano EV would be an excellent choice for daily commuting. Moreover, with an expected starting price of about $38,000, it is set to be one of the most affordable options in the Indian EV market.

Eight years after its initial unveiling, questions remain: will the Nano EV fulfill its promise? Can it become India’s answer to the Wuling Hongguang MINI EV, or is the Indian EV market still a distant dream? The success or failure of the Nano EV will determine whether Ratan Tata’s vision—and his regrets—can be redeemed.

Source: Times of India, Shifting Gears

Who Remembers That AI Was Never Meant to Replace People?

Tendenzblick
-
0
Who Remembers That AI Was Never Meant to Replace People?

When OpenAI released Sora, a Vincentian video AI tool, on February 15, 2024, its video results amazed many. However, once the novelty wore off, the question arose: who will watch short, emotionless videos that lack a storyline? Similar to the metaverse, technologies that don’t address real-world needs or lack a stable business model eventually fade into hype. Sora, contrary to claims of advancing General AI, is a product of computing driven by heavy capital, lacking true technological innovation. 

Technically, Sora’s foundation relies on innovations like the Transformer, Diffusion, and GAN models. But these breakthroughs are not unique to OpenAI. Their success stems from scaling algorithms, data, and computing power, reflecting the political economy effects of Moore’s and Metcalfe’s Laws. Big models rely on massive computing through high-performance GPUs processing massive data sets, with companies like Microsoft investing heavily in supercomputing infrastructure, such as tens of thousands of NVIDIA A100 chips, providing immense computing power for training models like ChatGPT.

The training of big models is energy- and capital-intensive, raising the question: do the benefits outweigh the costs? A cost-benefit analysis should consider overlooked externalities, such as environmental impact and systemic risks, which are borne by the public. While big models can boost productivity by automating tasks like content creation, diagnosis, research, and legal reviews, they also risk replacing human workers, especially when ordinary consumers and content creators lack influence over the technology’s deployment. Thus, AI is not just a technological issue but a public one, shaped by political, economic, and legal forces beyond technology itself.

Human labor is being devalued, reduced to auxiliary services for machines. The AI-generated content from tools like ChatGPT and Sora, which lacks emotion or a storyline, is often praised, while human-created work is criticized or ignored. This shift is influencing education and the future of humanity, with parents questioning the value of traditional education when many future jobs may not require human workers. While experts know this isn’t true, the industry’s promotion of AI as a solution may lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy. Teenagers might increasingly rely on AI, leading to a decline in the quality of human work, which could ultimately justify replacing humans with machines.

To avoid this downward spiral, AI education must include humanistic and social science perspectives, rather than solely following narratives set by industry giants. The public must understand that AI is not a neutral technology; it is embedded within political, economic, and legal structures. While AI can learn and evolve, it remains a tool designed to achieve human-defined goals. We cannot abandon the pursuit of purpose, or our future could be shaped by those who control AI, like Microsoft and OpenAI.

OpenAI, once a non-profit aiming to “create value for everyone,” has shifted toward a for-profit model after its 2019 decision to abandon its non-profit status. Despite its initial promises of openness, OpenAI’s focus on protecting intellectual property grew stronger, particularly after Microsoft’s $1 billion investment. Now, OpenAI is effectively a research division of Microsoft, which strengthens its monopoly in operating systems and productivity tools. Microsoft’s strategy of acquiring platforms like GitHub and integrating AI into its products, such as Office Copilot and Bing, ensures its continued dominance.

Monopolies can lead to arbitrary pricing and decreased service quality, harming consumers. Microsoft’s strategy of subsidizing users and later imposing higher prices and lower quality is a common pattern in digital markets. In such cases, public oversight and regulation are necessary to protect consumer welfare. This includes price regulation, minimum service standards, and data security requirements.

Institutional leadership is essential to ensure AI development aligns with human values. Some argue for abandoning the human-centered approach, envisioning a future where AI surpasses human intelligence. However, this view, akin to extreme ecological beliefs, is not widely accepted. A humanistic stance is necessary, where AI remains a tool that supports human activities and is developed with human needs at the forefront.

In the era of artificial intelligence, machines are increasingly taking over tasks that once required human intellect, leaving humans with work that relies more on instinct. This shift, driven by a blend of technical, political, and economic forces, reflects a desire to reduce labor costs. For example, in industries like takeaway and express delivery, AI-driven algorithms are now performing managerial tasks, optimizing routes and schedules for human laborers. This allows capitalists to replace expensive brain work with cheaper automation.

The true purpose of creating machines is not to replicate human beings, as there are already billions of people on Earth, but to assist in tasks that are repetitive, tiresome, or beyond human capacity. AI’s role is to enhance productivity, not to fulfill emotional or existential needs. Therefore, the goal of AI development should be to create tools that help us perform necessary but monotonous tasks or to do things that are difficult or inefficient without AI.

From a humanistic perspective, the current direction of generative AI, such as OpenAI’s tools, is misguided. Generative AI tools like ChatGPT and Sora replicate what human creators can already do but lack the contextual depth, purpose, and adaptability that human-created content offers. As a result, they often only serve to entertain or confuse, rather than contribute to meaningful, authentic, or rigorous content creation.

There are three primary models of digital economy regulation shaped by distinct political and economic systems: the U.S. market-driven model, which fosters innovation and supports winner-takes-all dynamics; the state-driven model of China, which balances development and stability; and the rights-based model of the European Union, which strives to protect human dignity, privacy, and autonomy. The competition among these digital powers plays out across two dimensions: horizontally, between countries, in terms of technology, business models, and norms; and vertically, between countries and enterprises, particularly concerning foreign versus domestic tech companies.

The global expansion of digital technologies, including AI, has led to the U.S. advocating for the free flow of data and AI deployment across borders, a strategy known as digital imperialism. This allows U.S. companies to dominate the global digital market. On the other hand, countries that lack powerful local digital giants, such as those in the European Union, emphasize data sovereignty and restrict cross-border data flows to protect personal data rights and limit foreign companies’ access to local data.

Meanwhile, China’s approach to AI regulation is walking a tightrope—balancing progress and stability while facing immense pressure. This delicate balance may be essential for AI regulation, as allowing the market to drive AI development could lead to exploitation by digital giants and exacerbate fears of runaway AI, as expressed by figures like Elon Musk. 

However, maintaining an individual rights-based approach may stifle AI development, hindering the industry from progressing. In either case, the result could be exploitation, with digital giants like those in the U.S. reaping the benefits of AI without adequate oversight or regulation.

Source: softwarium, tech co, the job blog

1...456...265Page 5 of 265

Die Redaktion dieser Plattform hat sich das Ziel gesetzt, eine große Vielfalt an Meinungen zu präsentieren, um den Leserinnen und Lesern die Möglichkeit zu geben, sich selbst sich selbst zu informieren und eine eigene Meinung zu bilden. Sowohl positive als auch kritische Nachrichten, Berichte oder Kommentare sind willkommen und werden wertgeschätzt. Alle Beiträge bemühen sich weiterhin, um einen respektvollen und höflichen Umgangston. (Medienprojekt von VANA)

Kontaktieren Sie uns: info@tendenzblick.net

© Copyright - TB - Aktuelle Nachrichten online